Attendees:

  • Ann Crowley
  • Tom Trutt
  • Andy Horbal
  • Laura Daniels
  • Debra Howell
  • Simeon Warner
  • Jenn Colt
  • Vandana Shah
  • Jesse Koennecke

Regrets:

  • Liz Parker

Agenda:

  • Support/Security Team Updates - Tom
    • Quesnelia scheduled for before WOLFcon - we will delay until after
      • Training: Quesnelia and Eureka platform
      • Test will be dry run
      • Prod will be Quesnelia (not Eureka)
  • Reporting
    • MetaDB role out schedule: Metadb Rollout Plan
    • NOTE: Go-live moved to November due to staffing changes at IndexData
  • Anything from CC/PC/TC - Simeon/Jesse/Jenn
    • CC- Christopher Spaulding and Simeon Warner will be co-chairs
      • Deficit budget: fees going up but membership not going up
    • PC - Caitlin Stewart (LoC) and Alexis from Stanford co-chairs
      • Where do things go? PC or TC first?
      • Roadmap questions
    • TC - Jenn and Craig co-chairs
      • Jenn also doing module review for Reading Room front end 
  • Cornell JIRA for priorities: https://culibrary.atlassian.net/jira/software/projects/FOLIO/boards/108
  • WOLFcon: Simeon, Tom, Sharon, Jesse, Laura, Tobi Hines, Natalya 
  • Open discussion time - new business?

    • At today's meeting, can we go over CUL representation across the FOLIO community (i.e., SIGs, Working Groups, Councils)? I bring this up because I had a follow-up session with Magda Z. yesterday based on my comments from recent UAT for bulk edit. Some of what she said about the BELA group's initial acceptance of features and, at the same time, members of that group apparently misunderstanding some basic aspects of the acceptance test gave me pause. I haven't been attending those meetings as I assumed others with comparable knowledge and perspective were, but now I'm wondering. I definitely don't want us overrepresented anywhere, and I don't want to attend meetings I don't need to, but I do want to make sure we are both aware of and influencing development of apps and features we care about.

      (For context, no one here misunderstood the UAT, it was SMEs from other institutions that were apparently confused)



  • No labels