Background: Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Livingstone (antigenic formula 6,7,14:d:l,w) is a serovar of the O:7 (C1) serogroup. This serovar was first isolated in 1951 from human feces in UK. From 1999 to 2003, there was a huge surge in the isolation of serovar Livingstone from human salmonellosis infections and animal-based food products in Tunisia. During 1989-1991, serovar Livingstone was the third most prevalent Salmonella serotype isolated from human salmonellosis infections in the Tayside area of Scotland.

NCBI PD Serovar Link for Serovar Livingstone: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pathogens/isolates/#(taxgroup_name:%22Salmonella%20enterica%22)%20AND%20computed_types:(%22serotype=Livingstone%22)

Genetic characteristics: Serovar Livingstone has been found to be polyphyletic with four lineages identified and one stand-alone singleton that does not cluster with any other Salmonella Livingstone isolates. In a nosocomial outbreak associated with serovar Livingstone in Tunisia, all outbreak strains (n=16) exhibited resistance to ceftriaxone and ceftazidime, mediated by the production of an extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL). Additionally, they showed resistance to multiple aminoglycosides (kanamycin, tobramycin, netilmicin, gentamicin, and amikacin) as well as sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim. The ESBL resistance was encoded on a 40-kb conjugative plasmid. Genetic analysis revealed the presence of the mobile insertion sequence ISEcp1 upstream of blaCTX-M-27, positioned similarly to its arrangement in blaCTX-M-14. A novel trimethoprim resistance gene, dfrA21, was identified on a 90-kb plasmid. This gene was integrated as a single resistance cassette within a class I integron. Li et al. identified five clades of serovar Livingstone, with evidence suggesting that the global animal feed trade likely facilitated their introduction into China. Among these, Clade-5-I-a/b—the predominant lineage in China—demonstrated invasiveness in murine, avian (chicken), and zebrafish infection models. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicated that the vast majority (>96%) of Chinese Livingstone isolates exhibited multidrug resistance. In a comparative study, all Tunisian isolates exhibited resistance to amoxicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, ticarcillin, cefalotin, gentamicin, and kanamycin, as well as to third-generation cephalosporins (cefotaxime and ceftazidime). In contrast, Belgian isolates remained susceptible to all tested antibiotics. Genotypically, the Tunisian isolates were homogeneous, belonging exclusively to sequence type ST543, whereas the Belgian isolates exhibited greater diversity with eight strains typed as ST543, two as ST638, and one as ST457. All isolates including them from Tunisia and Belgium carried five chromosomal genes (agfA, hin/H2, iroB, phoP/Q, and slyA) but lacked the plasmid-encoded spvA and spvC.

Animal reservoir: Poultry is likely to be a potential reservoir for serovar Livingstone. 

Geographical distribution: Serovar Livingstone has been reported worldwide.

Human outbreaks:

Year

Location

Associated source

Number of cases

2023-2024

US: Utah

Restaurant-related (no common source was identified)

11

2002

Tunisia

Nosocomial 

16

2001

Norway, Sweden

Processed fish products

44 in Norway, 16 In Sweden

1989-1991

Scotland

Not identified

71

Animal outbreaks:

Year

Location

Breed

Number of cases

1980UKCBA/ca mice601

1 Only mice under 3 weeks old exhibited symptoms of enteritis. They were treated orally with tetracycline, 10 g/L drinking water for 10 days.

Border rejections:

Year

Exporting country

Importing country

Associated source

Product category

2020USGreeceFish mealFeed materials

Recalls:

YearLocationRecalled foodType
2024SlovakiaRucola from ItalyFruits and vegetables
2020PolandHulled sesame seeds1Nuts, nut products and seeds

1 Salmonella Amsterdam and Salmonella Livingstone were found in sesame seeds from India, packed in Poland.

Relevant links:

  1. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/path.1700660136
  2. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9641423/
  3. https://jidc.org/index.php/journal/article/view/25116661
  4. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1547190/full#h10
  5. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38870481/
  6. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1081247/
  7. https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/jmm/10.1099/00222615-40-2-139
  8. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3865763?seq=1
  9. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1258/002367781780893812
  10. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/screen/notification/429239
  11. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/screen/notification/722139
  12. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/rasff-window/screen/notification/433397
  • No labels