You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Attendees:

  • Debra Howell
  • Laura Daniels
  • Ann Crowley
  • Vandana Shah
  • Emily Zinger
  • Andy Horbal
  • Jesse Koennecke
  • Phil Robinson
  • Simeon Warner
  • Jacob Sayward
  • Tom Trutt

Regrets:

Agenda:

FYI

  • Kiwi upgrade complete. Awaiting Hot Fix 2 for a couple of issues we found (release is March 15th)
  • Patron Feed:
    • PeopleSoft will be down from March 3-6 for move from IBM to AWS
    • Notify CU-LIB with scenarios of "how this impacts you"

Tracking

  • UPDATE - Andy
    • At Monday's RA SIG meeting Stephanie Buck gave an update on Title-Level Requesting (TLR) and noted that institutions that wanted to implement it will likely be able to do so as early as Morning Glory. More details can be found on the FOLIO wiki here: https://wiki.folio.org/display/RA/Title+level+requests+-+features+and+info. Would CUL want to implement Title-Level Requesting - how do we make the decision as it spans functional areas? It definitely would impact both access services and LTS workflows, and might affect other areas as well, such as CUL-IT via Blacklight. - Andy
      • 1 use case that we can think of: Long term loan laptops where the patron wants the next one that's available
      • Could have potential for reserves stuff
    • Next step: Andy will work with Access Services and Public Services to see if we want this and report back
      • Andy talked with Bonna and her recommendation is to ask the ASST to consult with other groups and come up with a recommendation for CUL
    • Andy's notes on prioritization:
      • Of these five issues, the one on line 35 of the “Cornell Current Priorities” spreadsheet you created (“Wrong slips are being inserted . . . ”) is our #1 top priority, and we humbly submit that it should be pretty high up on CUL’s list as well.
      • We think that the ones on lines 32 (“Part of the extended time . . . “), 33 (“The ‘print by default’ settings . . .”), and 34 (“Showing the print preview . . . “) would ideally be grouped as a single priority called something like “improve printing,” and it’s also pretty important to us. If we HAVE to treat them separately, the one on line 34 is the biggest problem, but it might also be the toughest one to solve.
      • The one on line 31 (“Pick slips need to include . . . “) has gotten quite a bit of attention on JIRA lately and appears to be headed to the RA SIG for further discussion. We will continue to advocate for this in the FOLIO community, but don’t necessarily think it needs to be super high up on CUL’s list of priorities.
  • No labels