This document is intended to contain examples possible of persistent identifier strings and their pros and cons.
Jon: why is it necessary to have multiple paths (commons/record, commons/html, and commons/xml)? There seems to be concern that content negotiation is the equivalent of polysemy (one name, many meanings), but this adds another component to every identifier, and we anticipate that only a relative few of our identifiers will offer more than one form of representation
From URI-based Naming Systems for Science
|
http://purl.org/commons/record/ncbi_gene/24866 |
Registering a domain name, directing it to purl.org (CNAME), and basing identifiers on the registered name
From URI-based Naming Systems for Science
|
http://purl.obofoundry.org/obo/OBI_0000225 = http://purl.org/obo/OBI_0000225; both reference http://ashby.csail.mit.edu/cgi-bin/obiterm?ref=OBI_0000225 |
Jon: This might be a way for a collection to continue its own branding when publishing otherwise meaningless persistent identifiers, as for example registering the domain name handle.ecommons.cornell.edu and directing it to http://hdl.handle.net
, so that a URL in the form http://handle.ecommons.cornell.edu/1813/734 could be published instead of http://hdl.handle.net/1813/734; both would resolve to http://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/734