Scope:
Contact: Pam Stansbury, Jean Pajerek
Unit: LTS, Law TS
Date last updated:
Date of next review:
Minimum Required Fields:
Title, correctly transcribed (245 field)
Place of publication, correctly transcribed in 264 field $a and correctly coded in fixed field (008/15-17)
Name of publisher, correctly transcribed in 264 field $b
Correct date of publication, in both fixed field (008/07-14) and 264 field $c
Name of at least one contributor (if applicable), correctly transcribed (100, 110, 111, 700, 710, 711)
Language of the resource correctly coded in the fixed field (008/35-37)
Form of item coded “o” (for online) in the fixed field (008/23)
e-ISBN (020 $a)
Print ISBN, if there is one (020 $z)
Correct URL (856 $u)
LC Classification
Bibliographic level - m,s,i
________
Recommended fields:
3xx
006/007
LC Subject terms (LCSH or FAST)
_________
Fields we should remediate ourselves if needed:
3xx
006/007
________
Workflow Draft from MARC record service implementation
- Receive sample record set for non-EBSCO vendor or receive new package MARC from EBSCO monthly load
- Send either set to cataloging for review
- For non-EBSCO forward MARC file. For EBSCO set, send the package ID and link to Blacklight search. These are sent to cataloging.
- Cataloging responds with feedback
- Feedback is sent to vendor if needed
- Feedback sent to automation if local changes are needed
- If records are not able to be improved by the vendor options are:
- In case of vendor:
- Sometimes better records are available for purchase
- We may need to remediate ourselves as best we can
- In case of EBSCO:
- Look for better source of records, if available, ask EBSCO to acquire the records from that source (usually the vendor)
- If better records are only available via OCLC, EBSCO cannot acquire them, therefore consider switching to OCLC collection manager for those records
- If better records are available from the vendor but they won't give them to EBSCO, consider switching to loading from the vendor instead
- Cataloging, acquisitions, and automation should collaborate on finding the best balance of good description, accurate access, and efficient records management.