Date Created: November 8, 2023 Last Updated: June 20, 2024
Overview: The security of university owned buildings where students live presents moderate/high operational risks for Student & Campus Life that require due diligence to mitigate the risks in avoidance of physical or psychological harm to property or individuals that could result in expenses or reputational harm to the university.
Criticality: Moderate/High | Frequency: Daily | Turnaround: |
Process Owner(s) / Key Parties / Contacts / Responsibilities:
Key Documents / Sources of Information:
System Access Needed:
Process Documented in Chronological Order:
Key Risks | Key Controls |
Co-Op officers manage their own budgets and spending priority is based on interests of the individual house. Securing properties is costly and often is not prioritized over maintenance and repairs. | Facilities provides guidance to House Officers around property management decisions and assists them by processing the financial transactions. Note: as with life safety systems, Co-Ops have the discretion to mandate some items such as security spending within reason, but professional staff will not prioritize security over health and safety. Limited funding is always the issue. |
Deprovisioning of applications that store building access, key and card management, and housing assignments is unclear. | High risk systems that are owned by SCL are audited and accounts are routinely deprovisioned. (AccessIT! is managed outside of SCL and it is not known who owns and manages the KMS accounts.) |
Key access during breaks or for exceptions (i.e., shabbat students) is managed by the House Officers and is not documented in written procedures. | Facilities conducts audit of temp badges for card access to SCL owned buildings but some scenarios involving key loans are not covered in audit. |
Autonomy of Co-Op officers may result in gaps in storage, transitioning from one group of leaders to the next, and documentation of keys. | Key check in/out happens in RIC which populates to StarRez. New Keys are given the building as a storage location in KMS. Contractor and staff keys are tracked in KMS |
It is widely believed that students prop doors open, share card access, and enter with visitors who do not have credentials checked. | This is a challenging human behavioral issue that does not have a key control in place. |
Visitors who are not affiliated with Cornell are not subject to compliance with the Campus Code of Conduct. | Violations of the Campus Code of Conduct are managed through the Office of Student Conduct and Community Standards, and when appropriate violations are referred to local, state, and federal authorities for action. |
Glossary of key terms/acronyms:
Process Flow Chart is forthcoming.