One advantage (and limitation) of CIT's Virtual Desktop service is that they limit what applications you can run to the ones they host. (You can package apps for them to host.) |
| VDI service | Today's staff desktops | Desktops with white-listing |
|---|---|---|
100% whitelisting. If CIT hasn't allowed it, it won't run.
| If Admin access required for an install, most end-users can't install new software. However, if software can just be used without installation, user can run it. For example, Putty.exe will work. | Can run in audit-only mode to first learn of potential impact. See below idea for more. |
This would be a way to reality-check wisdom of such a move.
Also, this can work for Mac OS, if tools are found for that operating system. (VDI is Windows-only.)
Phases can help us think about advantages of this approach:
In many ways, CIT's VDI service allows less control than having Faronics's DeepFreeze on a computer. And DeepFreeze can prevent necessary updates. But what about Faronics’s Anti-Executable Enterprise, if Microsoft’s solutions (AppLocker, Device Guard) don’t meet our needs?
Faronics’s Anti-Executable Enterprise:
Microsoft AppLocker overview:
Microsoft Device Guard overview: