Documentation mostly of value to ChemIT staff. |
It won't know you're sending to ChemIT, and will send the request to the CU Help desk. Just don't.
Be sure to look for and help edit / classify / assign calls throughout the day
Look for calls marked "Email update" – May include open or resolved calls. This indicates that new email has been received which may need action. Read, and clear the "Updated by Email" checkbox. Save. Re-open resolved tickets if necessary.
Per CU's Remedy Support Team, 9/27/13: If you have issue with Remedy this morning, there is a good chance that the problem can be resolved by clearing your browser cache. Instructions for how to do this in the major browsers can be found at:
http://www.wikihow.com/Clear-Your-Browser's-Cache
There is no need to clear your browsing history, cookies, or other elements. If after clearing the browser cache, you still cannot log in, please email remedy-admin@cornell.edu for assistance.
Happens when calls passed back-and-forth with CIT. For instance, with the ATC. Oliver sent one of our tickets to ATC (CIT), INC000000895224. When they did their work, Oliver went to email the client from within the ticket, in Remedy, and he noticed:
It //defaulted// to a From: address of the ATC, not ChemIT. Oliver fortunately noticed this and changed the From: address back to ChemIT before sending the email. Don't forget to watch for this. :-)
These fields were set to Course Technologies (John S Udall). Oliver noticed ticket not showing up in his queue. But he's leaving it as-is for this ticket because next action still with John Udall.
9/5/13
When you change ownership of a ticket to another "Assigned Group" in Remedy, it can (and often does) change the from/reply-to address.
There are a couple of options for working with this functionality --
1.) If you assign a ticket to one of the teams in Academic Technologies (for example Course Technologies), then you can request that they re-assign the ticket back to ChemIT (Is that -- Assigned Group = Cornell University - IT > A&S > Chemistry ?), once the ticket is complete. Then you can close the loop with the customer.
2.) Where things get tricky is if both groups (Academic Technologies, and ChemIT) are communicating with the customer from within the ticket via Remedy Email while the ticket is being worked. (This is the scenario we are seeing with INC000000895224.) When this occurs, we each have to be careful to look at the from/reply-to address when emailing from within Remedy. The from/reply-to address will depend on which group owns the ticket at the time. Functionally, it doesn't matter, because it all goes to Remedy, and is keyed off the Incident number. But the goal, I think, is to avoid confusing the customer.
I don't think that this is inconsistent with what you were saying in your email & Remedy tips in Confluence. It just calls out that, a.) if you want Academic Technologies to re-assign tickets back to ChemIT in Remedy when we are done with them, so that you can follow-up, we can do that. But you will have to ask us to do that each time / for each ticket. And b.) if we are going back-and-forth with a customer, then we both need to be careful about where the emails are saying that they are coming from.
One thing that I haven't tested is who can reply to a ticket via email, and expect to have response forwarded to the customer automatically by Remedy. I think that also depends on which person is assigned to the ticket at the time. This might be worth testing at some point.
It's worth mentioning that Academic Technologies has only been using Remedy since January, 2013. We are still shaking out our business processes around its use. Some units of CIT have been using Remedy much longer, and may have other business processes in place. So, I'm not sure you can generalize beyond tips about the behavior of the Remedy application itself (which in some cases, may have different configurations, and therefore different behaviors, from group to group).