Currently there are the following workflows in the RDA Toolkit:

• Cornell: Cheat Sheet for Content/Media/Carrier Fields in RDA
• Cornell: Cheat Sheet for the New Authorities Fields
• Cornell: Maps workflow
• Cornell: Photocopies

Here are issues that we need clearer agreement on, or at least documentation justifying Cornell's stand:

• 040 subfield b eng
• Use of 490:0 :  (I am seeing a surprising number of catalogers still tracing their series.  I'm not sure David Banush's memo on non-PCC cataloging ever really took).
• Relationship designators---we're trying to use them, as long as we can choose an appropriate one.  Right?
• 245 $a Transcribing author's affiliations.  Some are, some are adding to record.
• 500 Should we add notes like "Poems" or "Short stories" like AACR2.  Not spelled out in RDA.
• 260 Rules says to add first place mentioned or all.  Do we want a ruling or leave it to cataloger's judgment?  If the second one is in the US, we might want to include?
• 504 Follow rule or Stanford's model for unnumbered pages.
• 500 for Cover title.  Not really spelled out in list of examples in Toolkit.
• 245 $a Use of capitals.  Continue familiar practice, or capitalize first letter of each word or whole word if on piece, or leave up to cataloger?
• 040 Order of $e rda in string
• Fixed field -- Use of the Literary Form fixed field.  Do we want to have a policy? 
• Fixed field -- Audience, not just when the book is juvenile: Adult, Specialized, General.  Do we want to have a policy? 
• Flowchart for compilations/collaborations?