h2. Why Drag Analysis is Necessary



Observation of the tube settlers yielded interest in floc buildup and floc flow in tubes. As the flocs began to build up, some started to roll up the tubes and flow out into the effluent instead of settling out and falling back into the floc blanket. It was determined that a drag force was possibly preventing the flocs from settling out. The question remained, however, as to why smaller tubes at higher flow rates experienced the rolling flocs but not the larger tubes.
It was determined that velocity gradients vary with the tube diameter, and lead to variant drag force on the flocs. As the diameter decrease for a tube at the same {latex}\large\[V_\alpha\]{latex} the velocity profile maintains the same amplitude, increasing the maximum velocity gradient experience by a floc on the tube wall. The following analysis was performed to find the threshold velocity gradient that results in a drag force which exceeds the force due to gravity which settles the flocs. 


{float:right|border=2px solid black}
!Plate Settler Spacing Research Fall 2008^Uniformflow.png|width=200px|height=250px!
*Figure 1: Development of Uniform Flow*
{float}

h3. Velocity Gradients

The Reynolds number and entrance region length were calculated to determine whether the flow through the tubes was transient or laminar. With Reynolds numbers below 100 the length of the entrance region was determined by the following equation:
 {latex}
\large
$l_e  = 0.06{\mathop{\rm Re}\nolimits}  \cdot d$
{latex}

It was then determined that the flow though the tubes became laminar very quickly. 

Figure 1 shows the evolution flow from uniform to laminar. The parabola represents the velocity profile through the tubes. It is clear from this image that flocs experience high velocity gradients along the sides of the profile. 

The next calculation involved the Navier Stokes equation for laminar flow through a cylindrical tube, as seen below.

 {latex}
\large
$\frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial r}} = \frac{1}{\mu }\left( {\frac{{\partial p}}{{\partial z}}} \right)R + c_1 $
{latex}


Final equation:

{latex}
\large
$\frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial r}} = \frac{{4 \cdot V}}{R}$

{latex}
This equation was evaluated at R, the radius of the tube, to find the maximum velocity gradient at the tube walls.  Table 1 lists the velocity gradient values for each tube at the test critical velocities. 

{float:right|border=2px solid black|width=700}
{excel:file=PSS flow rate experiment^DataAnalysis_aguaclara.xls |sheet=Velocity Gradient Table}
*Table 1. Results: The Velocity Gradients for the Tested Critical Velocities*
{float}

In order to determine a  minimum plate spacing for the tanks in AguaClara plants, a Navier Stokes equation for laminar flow between two flat plates was used. 


 {latex}
$\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial y}} = \frac{1}{\mu }\left( {\frac{{\partial p}}{{\partial x}}} \right)y + c_1 $
{latex}

Final equation:


{latex}
\large
$\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial y}} = \frac{{3V}}{{2h}}$

{latex}

The minimum spacing for plate settlers can be determined using the above equations. 


The velocity gradients found in each tube over the range of critical velocities can be found in Table 1. By comparing the velocity gradients in table 1 and the results table from the [flow rate experiment|PSS flow rate experiment] it can be determined that once the velocity gradient in the tube reaches a certain value, failure occurs. From the data it appears that failure occurs around 2.4 1/s, as velocity gradients beyond this value correspond with failure in the two smallest tube sizes tested. 



h3. Drag on a floc
{float:right|border=2px solid black}
!Drag on floc.png|width=90px|height=90px!
*Figure 2: Force Balance on a floc*
{float}
Figure 2 shows the force balance on a floc. As stated before, it is believe that when the drag force on a floc exceeds force due to gravity, the floc beings to roll up the tube.