Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

(1) Let's look again at the Arapaho gospel of St. LukeSwitch to text view.

  • Is this OCR accurate to the visually captured page? 
  • What is a word? How would you define "word" to a computer?
  • What isn't a word? How would you tell a computer to exclude these?
  • Consider languages with which you are familiar.  Can you think of cases where tokens might contain more than one word?
  • What sets of rules would we need in order to tokenize effectively?  Would these be ordered in any specific way?
  • Is there a "right way" to tokenize?

...

nGrams are words or phrases, tokenized and counted in a defined corpus and displayed as a graph showing how relative frequencies of those phrases have occurred as occurring over publication date. The two tools referenced below provide a basis for exploration of ngrams.  Each tool is bound to secondary data derived from analysis of a different corpus, so results of the same nGram will not necessarily align. 

...

  • How easily can these examples above be refined and improved?
  • Compare the two interfaces, especially as to the affordances and the limits of each. 
  • What additional elements of control would be useful that aren't available?
  • When we see unexpected wave forms, what do we make of these? 
    • Do these constitute discoveries or represent errors?  How can we distinguish?
    • Would the flaws be due to the data, the metadata, the algorithms?

...

Discussion

  • In general, do the results look valid? Do any of these algorithms yield results that might be considered confusing or less than perfect?

  • Note that results can be downloaded.  What might be advantages of this portability?Note the portability of the results.  Can you think of advantages to this? 
  • Are there things that the researcher would want or need to know about these algorithms when making claims about results?

...