*** This version of Confluence is for testing only and contains a copy of content from June 29th 2026. No changes will be preserved. ***
Sedimentation Tank Experiments
Introduction
There are three variations of sedimentation tanks that the demo plant team can use. The purpose of these experiments were to find which sedimentation tank produced the lowest effluent turbidity when run at a number of flow rates. The preferred tank will be used in the production of additional demo plants. The tanks are displayed below. Below are the 3 versions of our Sedimentation Tanks:
Closed Top Tank:
Open Top Tank:
Parallel Lamella Tank:
Procedure
We ran our Demo Plant with the above tanks at 50, 100, and 150mL/min in order to observe which sedimentation tank resulted in the lowest turbidity overallThe experimental set up consists of the stock clay solution at .5 g/mL and a stock alum solution at 1 g/mL. Two peristaltic pumps controlled by the process controller control the flow of both solutions into the flocculator (the same flocculator is used in each of the three setups). The solution with the flocs then flow into the sedimentation tank and the effluent is moved to a turbidimeter by a third peristaltic pump. The Demo Plant was run with the above tank at flow rates of 50, 100, 150 mL/min.
Results
Graph of Comparison at 50mL/min:
Graph of Comparison at 100mL/min:
Graph of Comparison at 150mL/min:
Conclusion
From this data, it was observed that at 100mL/min and 150mL/min the Open Top design produced the lowest turbidity. At 50mL/min, the Parallel Lamella design resulted in the lowest turbidity. Because the ideal flow rate that the plant would be running at is 100 mL/min, the open top design was chosen for further use.