Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

The Flow Controller device is used to maintain a constant level of water in a source, a constant head tank, which is refilled by a stock tank. By adjusting the constant head tank, different flow rates of Alum may be sent to the plant for the flocculation process. Field use of this device, however, is consistantly consistently inaccurate, diverging in direction relation to flow rate as well as tubing length. However, the majority of the data seems to indicate that are are infact in fact more confounding variables which make flow predictions nearly impossible. This dependence on faulty information, namely the inapplicable equations, may cause miss-dosing in the plant or a wasteful situation of using too much Alum for the plant.

Divergence specifically occurs to cause under delivery of alum to the plant, which decreases the efficacy of flocculation and has an adverse affect on effluent turbididtyturbidity. This section of the Flow Control Module Team is conducting tests to identify confounding variables to more accurately parameterize the equations to provide for more efficient flocculation in the plant.

Goals

This team is working specifcially specifically with the constant head tank as a distribution system with known parameters and an adjustable arm for dosing providing a known head loss from elevation. First it is important to verify that the tubes in use do, in fact, meet the specifications of smoothness and diameter. Once we are sure that the material is regular, and if not, once we may correct for this difference, it is important to see what the trend is in divergence from the Hagen-Poiseuille equation. Graphing of flow rate vs. Headloss Head loss allows for a simply relationship between the experimental and theoretical. Once these have been parameterized for the purposes of calculation, it will be useful to continue looking into possible sources of headloss head loss through the system or any factory that may deter flow.

...

The Linearization and Calibration Quiz- find out how much you really know about this flow controler controller sub team.
Linearization and Calibration team goals and meeting minutes.

...

Flow Rate vs. Headloss for Variable Tube Lengths
*Taking the new aparatusapparatus, flow rates were calcualted calculated relative to head loss and plotted again the Hagen-Poiseuille equation to anazlye analyze divergence from the mathematical model

...

  • Experiments were conducted to establish a model for the relationship between FCM outflow and headloss head loss associated with outflow tube position

...

Wiki Markup
Based on the work so far, it may be concluded that there are variables that are causing significant distortion between experimental and theoretical results. Also, this may be attributed to manufacturing, due to its strongly correcting aspect intermsin terms of the equations. Additional conclusions as they relate to future topics may be found \[here\|FC LinCalib-Sp09 Callenges\].