Page History

...

We have hypothesized that because our experimental apparatus is currently limited to generating Poiseuille flows, there are no transverse velocities with respect to the streamlines of the flow strong enough to keep large flocs in suspension once they are large enough to settle out. Therefore, large flocs are settling out on the bottom walls of the tubes where the streamline velocity is at a minimum and where there are negligible velocities normal to the wall to scour the flocs back towards the center of the pipe. There are several reasons why this is unwanted:

First, if flocs are settling out, they are not making it out of the flocculator and we loose information about the performance of our flocculator. Since we are interested in how shear/strain affects floc size and the final clarity of the water, we need the flocs to stay in suspension so we can measure how well they were formed. With significant premature sedimentation, the measurements of final settling effluent turbidity clearly underestimates flocculation performance.

Secondly, (and related to the first point) not only does premature settling underestimate flocculation, but it also makes determining how parameters like flow rate (and other measurements of shear and strain) have affected flocculation. For instance, it is nearly impossible to determine for certain whether the steeper settling curves at higher flow rates was a result of larger flocs being formed or whether the higher flow rate just kept more flocs in suspension and thus was able to settle out faster.

Thirdly, the efficiency of the flocculator is compromised when big flocs settle out because the primary mechanism by which fine particles are removed from solution is adsorption onto large flocs. The poor final turbidity observed in our experiments may be due to too many large flocs settling out of the flow before they reach the end of the flocculator.

Lastly,