...
- Locate or create a Holdings record and add the appropriate Holdings Type, location, and call number* information for that the first title.
- If the first title is part of a multi-volume or serial, make sure it is represented in the Holdings Statement of the appropriate record (see also items 5 and 6 below for more on Holdings Statements, Enumerations, etc.)
- Add Oversize designation according to the dimensions of the overall volume covers, even if the first part is smaller than the outer cover, and would not be oversize itself. (**See also below)
- In the Holdings Notes section, add a note, with Note type: Note, identifying the NEXT (second) part/title in the resource. Use the format "Bound with: [author name (last,first)]. Title of second part". If the title is excessively long, enter enough of it to allow for a reasonable search (see examples below). NOTE: this Holdings note should be PUBLIC. Do NOT check the "staff only" box at the end of the note field.
- Save and close the Holdings record.
- Alternate Approaches: We may also encounter a Bound-with resource whose Holdings note indicates that the title is the first in a volume that has a certain spine title. The term "lettered" is used to note what the spine title is (see examples 3 and 4). This approach is most often seen with Rare materials in the database. When creating new records for Bound-withs, LTS staff should follow step 1A above (as illustrated in the first 2 examples), but we should be aware of this second approach for "lettered" resources when correcting records.
B. OVERSIZE What if it starts with a v.1 that is not oversize by itself, but is inside Oversize covers, AND we also have v. 2-4, which are not oversize? Would they all be shelved in Oversize? Or would there be a Holdings note for v.1 saying it's shelved in Oversize? Would there be a separate Holdings for v.1 (Oversize), and for v. 2-4 (non Oversize)?
{Should we have a note somewhere about the Call numbers? Is that covered in a cataloging procedure? They should all be the same for the titles/parts in the {Should we have a note somewhere about the Call numbers? Is that covered in a cataloging procedure? They should all be the same for the titles/parts in the resource (unless they're series-class, and the numbers at the end would be different)?, and call number is for first part, and applies to all later parts, correct? -Separate Holdings for single issues/volumes of a serial/multi-vol. so it would share the same (main/first) call #? We should NOT add sequence numbers to the Call numbers, correct? (even though we may run into them?)) See also section below (Child records).
...
In general, use the same captioning used in the holdings for the serial or multi-part holdings string ("vol.", "pt.", "no."). If necessary, a note pertaining to the physical arrangement can also be added, as in the above example.
This technique can also be used to link holdings for for analyzed portions of serials to the serial record when a separate item record is not required or desired for the monographic records for the analyzed pieces. < <NO LONGER TRUE, PER CAMMIE 9/22/25 From the original procedure. Does it need fleshing out? Examples? Has it changed? It seems like Partially Analyzed Serials DO get empty item records for the monographic records? See Instance 1117089 (lacking "also cataloged as part..." note) as it relates to Instance 2013888, but there are also many counterexamples. Would this be where we might insert a link to partially analyzed serial explanation page? See also below notes.
B. Special OVERSIZE section here, for complicated cases? e,g, What if it starts with a v.1 that is not oversize by itself, but is inside Oversize covers, AND we also have v. 2-4, which are not oversize? Would they all be shelved in Oversize? Or would there be a Holdings note for v.1 saying it's shelved in Oversize? Would there be a separate Holdings for v.1 (Oversize), and for v. 2-4 (non Oversize)?
6. Item Records for second or subsequent titles with Holdings Statements/Enumeration/Chronology:
...