Page History

...

• Review enhancement requests
• Security Team Updates - Phil 
• At Monday's RA SIG meeting Stephanie Buck gave an update on Title-Level Requesting (TLR) and noted that institutions that wanted to implement it will likely be able to do so as early as Morning Glory. More details can be found on the FOLIO wiki here: https://wiki.folio.org/display/RA/Title+level+requests+-+features+and+info. Would CUL want to implement Title-Level Requesting - how do we make the decision as it spans functional areas? It definitely would impact both access services and LTS workflows, and might affect other areas as well, such as CUL-IT via Blacklight. - Andy
• CONTINUED: Themes and Discuss how we might maintain this going forward: Continue conversation on "How do we understand and agree on CUL priorities for FOLIO?"
  • Notes from last meeting:
    • How do we get to a handful of top priorities?
    • Could we code it like the Faculty Survey results?
    • Could we build Epics around the themes for CUL?
    • How many potential areas of the Library are impacted by an issue?
    • Share the priority list in a place that people can see it
    • What data do we already have?
      • JIRA R1s
      • Pointing exercise Excel spreadsheet
      • Holly's Access Services usability study: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ab1rAhQYgHEbrreCsMhr0RW6uFJftMs1NwSBZ8gbSeY/edit?usp=sharing 
      • List of LTS issues (Excel):  analysis: https://cornell.app.box.com/file/891530533804
      • CUL List of Enhancement Requests
  • Data review (Box: https://cornell.app.box.com/folder/150398038273)
• Open discussion time

...