Page History

...

1. Announcements
1. Possibility of PowerNotes demo - from Kelley’s time
1. Knight Writing prospective partner, Kelley had intended to pursue
2. Nina - assessing for use at Law, knows about new features. Can set up outline.
3. Kim is interested, as per Nina
4. Wilson from PN left subscription open
5. Goal? To bring to users? Nina notes at integrated in writing at Tennessee?
6. Past questions to still be resolved?
7. Law as site of exploration? Or direct to Knight?
8. Chrome and Firefox extensions
9. Aliqae will find past year documentation and share with team
1. Plans for next Cornell/Tsinghua webinar
1. Lenora and Mary working together on Tsinghua webinars
2. Report on Get Started Workshops; discussion about what to change next year
1. Numbers very low: 4 classes, 1 with 2, 2 with 0, 3 with 5, 4 with 2 = 9 participants
2. Off cycle event, no inclusion in central orientation calendar. Known that this was potential consequence, discussed in central orientation planning group.
3. This year’s process and how it impacted decisions, actions for Get Started
4. If not included in central promotion, worth reviewing and pursuing alternate promotion venues for next year. Hardly any promotion outside of calendar, some flyers made.
5. Follow up sessions did not happen, canceled due to no registration
3. Review of Charge and Goals using new template; seeking team input
1. Directors created template for public services teams: charge, goals, etc.
2. Goal: all team documents in place by end of semester
3. Lenora, Aliqae, and Mary reviewed last year goals draft from annual report, any new requests made, and identifying doable steps that indicate accomplishments
4. Draft goals and objectives. One is not attached to a specific subteam: creating checklist, guiding documentation for new CUL instructors. Potential inclusion of people outside of the Instruction team. 
1. Lynn volunteered to join such an effort from a non-new instructor perspective
2. Nina will see if any at Law are interested
3. Ashley noted potential inclusion of Selena Bryant as a good candidate
4. Timeline? End of academic year
5. Aliqae will be planning orientation for new instructor, will make notes to pass along
6. Alison mentioned Rachel Holder as potential member
7. Lenora noted variations in how checklists are applied, overlapping checklists for functional areas
4. Subteam updates
1. Guides
1. Accessibility: extended deadline for remediation, meeting with unit point people, limitations of process 
2. From Programming check-in: Canvas-Guides integration is important goal, do not want to take bandwith away from that. Guides team is very small right now. Instruction is being asked to how Canvas can happen quickly. Lynn asked about expections. Automatic population? Mary confirmed yes, has had experienced. Relatively straightforward, presence. Need better understanding of what is desired by her. Jeremy noted waiting on working test instance from CIT. Aliqae: 2 parallel: technical and goal. Lynn noted faculty jurisdiction. Mary: quick sketch: ask a librarian box. One page, no tabs, getting to the library. If there is a guide, yes, but otherwise default. Reference to document created by subteam. CTI? Mary can request meeting with all stakeholders: Lenora, Aliqae, Jeremy, Danianne, Lynne, Camille. Prepare meeting with set of questions ahead of time for her. Jeremy noted: CTI has stalled, need it for sandbox, opt-in/out choice, what populates, and faculty perspective. How it relates to librarian guidance and existing guides. Potential talking to UNC. Back to showcase: themes like active learning to focus. 
3. Canvas document submitted to Danianne 11/18: LibGuides and Canvas Integration Options
2. Programming:
1. End of semester showcase idea shared with Danianne, Danianne asked to hold pending goals work, bandwith discussion. Mary met, Danianne is supportive ideas with theme-based approach. Canvas-Guides integration is important goal, do not want to take bandwith away from that. Guides team is very small right now. Instruction is being asked to how Canvas can happen quickly. Lynn asked about expections. Automatic population? Mary confirmed yes, has had experienced. Relatively straightforward, presence. Need better understanding of what is desired by her. Jeremy noted waiting on working test instance from CIT. Aliqae: 2 parallel: technical and goal. Lynn noted faculty jurisdiction. Mary: quick sketch: ask a librarian box. One page, no tabs, getting to the library. If there is a guide, yes, but otherwise default. Reference to document created by subteam. CTI? Mary can request meeting with all stakeholders: Lenora, Aliqae, Jeremy, Danianne, Lynne, Camille. Prepare meeting with set of questions ahead of time for her. Jeremy noted: CTI has stalled, need it for sandbox, opt-in/out choice, what populates, and faculty perspective. How it relates to librarian guidance and existing guides. Potential talking to UNC. Back to showcase: themes like active learning to focus. 
3. Assessment:
1. review CLIQ on agenda
2. Mel reviewing assessment data with Assessment
3. Mary confirmed that recommendations would be reviewed by Directors and Danianne. Current expectation is that CLIQ is standard for undergraduate course-based instruction, with instructor latitude to use according to conditions
4. Will be reviewing assessments from Get Started
4. Outreach
1. Nina: Expect to see message to instructors-L on update to credit course page!
5. Next meeting: Oct 23 11am 237 Catherwood

August 28, 2019 meeting

Catherwood 237, 3:30pm

...