Page History

...

This concern will be shared with 2CUL Steering.

4. How do we regain up momentum?

No shared system is a barrier--is there any point?

Maybe we should take advantage of the relaxed time line for exploration of phase 1 findings.

How can we continue to generate momentum for TSI ideas, projects, and alliances that will benefit both of our institutions?

The teams are still a good place to generate new projects and ideas. Always have the other institution in mind when considering new projects.

Keep in mind that 2CUL is still active in collection development.

Without a shared LMS, there is no driving need that would prove a good collaboration environment, where are we now with this removed? Does the more relaxed time line offer opportunities?

Vote taken indicates that most believe we would have more opportunity for collaboration with a shared LMS. How? Receiving, EDI? Collection development considerations. There are areas where we do this without a shared LMS. Do we know what we would really gain by sharing a system. Would it make more sense to have a shared instance or independent instances of ALMA.

Lois and her work on documentation. How are our procedures in all groups compare and how are they described. Working together in this area might prove informative, but is this still important without integration?

For batch jobs, understanding of each others data is essential.

Working together on new workflows may be most beneficial.  Streaming video is an example of working on a new workflow jointly.

Lois compiling spreadsheet of documents between organizations, comparing naming of and linking to workflows and processes.

Training documents, such as RDA, that does not pertain to LMS functionality is a good area to share information.

Flexibility in group composition and information sharing on specific projects would be helpfulIt may be more productive to concentrate on new initiatives such as streaming video, training and documentation.