...
- Current answer: Hard drive RAID array in the head node.
- Choices identified by ChemIT, to work through with Czarek:
Choice to provision users' data storage: | Pro | Con | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
Within the head node | Sunk cost: Pay once and it lasts at least through warranty period, probably longer (no monthly costs) | May need to over-provision (pay extra up-front), speculating on future demands. Invest more now to reduce downtime due to future upgrade. |
|
SFS | Fee based: Get only what you need. | Fee based: Monthly costs. | Used pervasively in Chemistry research, with versioning turned on for all instances. |
NAS |
| Must confirm: Meets Matrix's performance needs? |
|
Dedicated, separate file server |
| Oliver not willing to have ChemIT set up and run? |
|
...
Decision 3: Head node specifications
Implementation questions:
Decision 4: Who gets "root" access?
Where should applications be installed and configured?
Where is "temp" (not backed up) data located?
The head node specifications is DEPENDENT on Decision 1 (and maybe Decision 2).
- Size decision
- 1U is cheapest, and fine if don't need to hold lots of drives.
- 2U is more expensive, but can hold more drives.
- Current answer:
- Proposed by ChemIT:
- Proposed by Czarek:
Decisions made
Compute nodes
...
- UPS (APC SMC1500-2U; $500; for head node only)
- 2-3 PDUs (power distribution units; a.k.a. power strips; $100 each)
- Qty depends on above decisions (amperage calculations)
Rack (~$500)
- $500
Implementation decisions (for after purchase decisions!)
Storage-related
For each question:
- Current answer:
- Proposed by ChemIT:
- Proposed by Czarek:
Where should applications be installed and configured?
Where is "temp" (not backed up) data located?
Who gets "root" access?
Considerations for upgrade (info-gathering phase)
...