Page History

...

For 100 NTU and 500 NTU, the fitted data seem accurate enough that we can trust the mean sedimentation velocities or the coefficient of variation retrieved. Data retrieved at low alum dosage seems to be really well fitted. However, at higher alum concentrations, at some points, raw data seems to have a behavior slightly different than the gamma function (figure ??)

Image Added!500 NTU,length2 1.jpg width=550,height=400,align=center!
Figure 18: Plot of the normalized turbidity as a function of sedimentation velocity for the ram data and the fitted data. 500 NTU water, alum dose of 10 mg/L, flocculator 5592 cm long!500 NTU,length2 5.jpg width=550,height=400,align=center

Image Added!
Figure 19*: Plot of the normalized turbidity as a function of sedimentation velocity for the ram data and the fitted data. 500 NTU water, alum dose of 50 mg/L, flocculator 5592 cm long

Image Added!500 NTU,length2 7.jpg width=550,height=400,align=center!
Figure 20*: Plot of the normalized turbidity as a function of sedimentation velocity for the ram data and the fitted data. 500 NTU water, alum dose of 70 mg/L, flocculator 5592 cm long!100 nTU, length2 10.jpg width=550,

Image Addedheight=400,align=center!
Figure 21*: Plot of the normalized turbidity as a function of sedimentation velocity for the ram data and the fitted data. 100 NTU water, alum dose of 100 mg/L, flocculator 5592 cm long