Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

For the second experiment, the alum dose range was set to be from 40mg/L to 110mg/L varying with an increment of 5mg/L and the influent turbidity set around 500 NTU. Repeating the process implemented for the first experiment, this data was run through Mathcad for an overview. However, unlike the previous experiment, looking at the gamma PDF graph (Figure 2) from Mathcad, the mean particle sizes did not vary significantly. With increasing alum doses, the floc size should have also differed. Yet comparing the size distribution for the lowest alum dose (40 mg/L) and the highest (110 mg/L), there was no comparable difference. In addition, reviewing the datalog, the approximate lowest NTU range also seemed to be similar (Table 2). From this analysis, we decided that either the accuracy of the result presented by this experiment was arguable or the alum dose of 40 mg/L was enough for effective flocculation. Since the dose of 40 mg/L seemed to have a similar effect as the higher alum doses, we decided to repeat this experiment with an expanded alum dose range to test even lower doses. An expansion of the range of alum dosages, from 10 mg/L to 100mg/L, was made to find the least alum dosage that will give effective flocculation.

Image Added
FIGURE 2: The graph plots normalized turbidity vs. sedimentation velocity for each Alum dose ranging 40 mg/L~110 mg/L

Alum Dosage (mg/L)

Approx. Lowest Turbidity Range (NTU)

40

~.85

50

~.94

60

~.88

70

~.88

80

~.76

90

~.76

100

.76~.98

110

.78~.99

...