*** This version of Confluence is for testing only and contains a copy of content from June 29th 2026. No changes will be preserved. ***
| Wiki Markup |
|---|
h1. Construction of the 2-D Scale-up Cooker |
...
h3.Design: Cooking Bigger Pots |
...
h4.The 2-D Expansion |
...
The objective for this semester was to design an oven that was capable of fitting the larger |
...
pots that the Nicaraguan women wanted to use. The main issue with the larger pots |
...
(below) was that they were too tall to fit in the previous design of the oven |
...
. {float:left|border=2px solid black|width=300px} {anchor:tank}[!bigpot.JPG|width=300px!|bigpot.JPG] h5.large Nicaraguan cooking pot {float} \\ Therefore, we decided to increase the height of the 1-D scale up version of the oven in order to fit the larger pots. {float:left|border=2px solid black|width=400px} {anchor:tank}[!1_D.JPG|width=400px!|1_D.JPG] h5.Fall 2008 1-D scale up(drawing done by fall 2008 class) {float} \\ The dimensions of the fall 2008 1-d scale up were 42.5" x 30" x 10.75". We decided that in order to safely fit the larger pots, that we would increase the height dimension by four inches, resulting in the new dimensions of 42.5" x 30" x 14.75". Figure 2: 2-D scale-up We hope that by constructing and testing the larger ovens we can learn more about how sizing effects the cooking speed. While the original goal was simply to fit a larger pot inside the oven, we hope that this oven will also allow us to learn more about the heat transfer in the box cooker. 2-D Scale up Construction To construct the scaled up box cooker, we followed a manual given to us by Grupo Fenix titled "Solar Box Cooker Construction Manual". The manual includes measurements of the individual parts of the original 30"x30" ovens currently in use in Nicaragua. It also contains a detailed set of instructions for construction. Our team determined the dimensions for the 2-D scaled up version of the oven by first measuring the 1-D scaled up oven constructed during the Fall 2008 semester. Our team combined the measurements from the oven, and Page 5 Spring 2009 2-D scale up (drawing done by fall 2008 class) (not to scale) the dimensions given in the manual to determine the dimensions for the pieces for the 2-D scale up. During the construction process we tried to follow the instructions outlined by the manual as closely as possible. We also tried to emulate the way in which the cookers were constructed in Nicaragua by drawing on the experience of team member who went to Nicaragua during Spring Break. There were some differences, however, in the construction of this oven in comparison to the previous ones. The differences included using a different wood sealant, using two pieces to form each L-shaped column, using different glass, using different hinges and attaching them differently, and putting fiberboard on top of the insulation in the door. The use of a different wood sealant was the suggestion of our team's advisor Mr. Timothy Bond. The sealant we used was "Clear Multisurface Waterproofing Sealer" by Valspar; it claims to be for severe weather. We used two-piece L-columns because cutting L-shaped columns is rather difficult and piecing these columns together from two separate wood pieces makes the construction process much easier. The glass made in the United States of America is different than obtained in Sabana Grande, Nicaragua. The hinges we used were of a different variety; their design allowed the two different sides of the hinges to be completely folded within one another when the door is closed. Also, we decided to follow the directions in the manual that suggested chiseling out a recess for the hinges in the door. This technique was not used on the previous box cookers that were constructed in the lab. The fiberboard that was added on top of the insulation on the door was more for convenience since the wood pieces we used for the support means were just a little under the desired height. We decided to add another layer on top of the fiberboard to account for this difference. The construction process for the 2-D scale up took almost the entire semester. The main problem in the construction process was the lack of construction meeting times. While we had increased the number of tests for the semester, we only had one meeting time for construction per week for most of the semester. We switched some of the testing times to Page 6 construction times later in the semester when our team realized that we needed to get the construction done. In addition, since the entire team was taking this course for independent study, it was difficult to maintain a constant level of commitment from every member of the team. Fortunately, we were able to complete the new box cooker during this semester, although we have yet to run any tests on it. Testing of |